lol..
Power up you mobo (it doesn't matter what mobo you have)
Go into cpu features
Disable Hyper Threading.
Select 2 Cores for slow die
OR
Select 1 Core for FAST die
Save and exit and.........you're ready - No overclock no nothing
CPU = DEAD!
keď myslíš..STENLY napísal:nevadí... mal potrebu to napísať... teraz mu je už fajne... asi...
"menej nanometer-menej adidas ??"Looks like my 2500k is dead... 4 days of use, now it doesn't even make it into windows without locking up...
Tried rolling back to stock - locks up on windows load up. Windows repair locks up.
Tried to use another HD and install windows on that. Locks up...
Looks like these might be duff, another guy with a d2 stepping 2500k had his die...
Any ideas on a way to test with only around 30sec before lockup when started?
Trying to underclock now...
it sounds, and I can't really believe it, like its degrading already... first it started with prime95 errors at 4.7ghz... then i rolled it to 4.6... prime errors began after an hour then 20mins... rolled to 4.4ghz... prime errors and lock ups using internet explorer, mozilla watching films and in games... etc
(ale +SOI, takže ešte uvidíme)
vyzera ze 32nm bulk v SB ma rovnake parametre ako predosly Clarkdale/Westmere (32nm HiK+MG)Just so you chaps are aware. Do not OC with bclk at all. This will kill the chips and the onboard parts such as USB, sound etc.
Anything over 1.4v is verging on dangerous territory on the 32nm chips so be careful.
KUA !!!How Not To Overclock A Clarkdale Pentium G6950 http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/phenom-ii ... 794-4.html
.... We killed the processor ... I set it to 1.475V.... There were no warning signs and the CPU lasted through a couple hours of Prime95 testing. Halfway through the overclocked benchmarking runs, the CPU simply died. Not while stress testing Prime95, mind you, but during the AVG virus scan benchmark. ...
Do G6950 som ja daval 1,42 V ....
jadra MAX 1,38VI just been contact Intel customer support and they say both i5 and i7 2500 and 2600 chip must NOT go over 1.380v in the bios and the memory volt must NOT go over 1.65v and that's the safer one!
Pietro sk napísal:
"jadra MAX 1,38V
ram MAX 1,65V (pre istotu 1,5-1.58V)
PLL Voltage MAX 1,9V
BCLK Base overclock - NIE
Toho sa budeme drzat 
-- vypichol som z celeho threadu v aglictine, fakty / hodnoty (nemusel som)dexter napísal:aj tomu veríš?
"menej nanometer-menej adidas ??"
ja nemozem ty voleeeeeeeeee 
to mas za 1000pts 
v tej chvili ma nenapadlo ze to bude vtipne, ale ok -- toto je lepsie aj ked po anglickymano8 napísal:"menej nanometer-menej adidas ??"
pietro toto ti vyslo
http://www.overclock.net/5836949-post1.html LOLok, well as you can see i have a q6600 with a whole 65 nanometers, and its awesome.
So my friend gets an e7400 and they totally rip him off. Instead of giving him 65 nanometers or more, they only give him 45, like WTH!!
So nedless to say i am pretty mad as intel is jipping my friend of his nanometers, so now his cpu will not be as good as my q6600, which is bad.
Intel used to give people like a whole 130 nanometers but lately they are being very stingy and are not giving us their nanometers so our cpu's are not as good.
Please help me boycott intel so they stop stealing our nanometers
